Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µðÁöÅÐ ±¤Çбâ¼úÀÎ 3D ÇÁ¸°ÅÍ·Î Á¦ÀÛµÈ Àӽüöº¹¿ë ·¹ÁøÀÇ µÎ²²º° »ö Æò°¡

Color evaluation by thickness of interim restorative resin produced by digital light processing 3D printer

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 43±Ç 3È£ p.77 ~ 83
°­¿ù, ±è¿ø±â,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¿ù ( Kang Wol ) - Daegu Health College Department of Dental Technology
±è¿ø±â ( Kim Won-Gi ) - Daegu Health College Department of Dental Technology

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the thickness-dependent color dimensions of digital light processing (DLP) three-dimensional (3D) printer and conventional interim restorative resin.

Methods: Specimens (N=60) were fabricated using either subtractive manufacturing (S group) or DLP 3D printing (D group) material. All milled and 3D-printed specimens were allocated into three different groups (n=10) according to different thicknesses as follows: 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm. Color measurements in the CIELab coordinates were made using a spectrophotometer under room light conditions (1,003 lux). The color differences (¥ÄE*) between the specimen and control target data were calculated. Data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Tukey's honestly significant difference method (¥á=0.05 for all tests).

Results: The ¥ÄL*, ¥Äa*, ¥Äb*, and ¥ÄE* values of interim restorative resin produced by DLP 3D printing were obtained in terms of the specimen's thickness increased compared with the increases by subtractive manufacturing. When the thickness was similar, the color difference between subtractive manufacturing and DLP 3D printing was ¡Ã5.5, which is a value required by the dentist for remanufacturing.

Conclusion: Color was influenced by the thickness of the interim restorative resin produced by DLP 3D printing.

Å°¿öµå

Color; Temporary dental restoration; Three-dimensional printing

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI